Legal Opinion
Kowalski v. Cedars of Portsmouth Condominium Ass'n
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided March 13, 2001No. 98-627PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBrock, C.J.
The defendant, Cedars of Portsmouth Condominium Association, appeals a decision of the Portsmouth District Court {Taylor, J.) awarding $4,956.43, including interest and costs, on the plaintiff’s, Robert J. Kowalski, unjust enrichment claim. The plaintiff cross-appeals, contending that the district court erred in finding no violation under the Consumer Protection Act, RSA ch. 358-A (1995) (amended 1996, 1997, 1999). We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand.
The parties agree on the following facts. The plaintiff owns condominiums in the Cedars of Portsmouth Condominium complex, which is…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Citaramanis v. HallowellCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1992
- Cohen v. Frank Developers, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1978
- DeCato Bros. v. Westinghouse Credit Corp.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1987
- R. Zoppo Co. v. City of ManchesterSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1982
- Cooper v. ParisDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Clapp v. Goffstown School DistrictSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2009
- Rok Builders, LLC v. 2010-1 SFG Venture LLCCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2013
- General Insulation Co. v. Eckman ConstructionSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2010
- In re Automotive Parts Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2014
- Blackthorne Group, Inc. v. Pines of Newmarket, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2004
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.