Legal Opinion

Freeman v. State

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1906PublishedCited by 5 opinions

FROM DAVIDSON. Appeal from the Criminal Court of Davidson County. —W. M. Hart, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McAlister

The presentment in this case embraces two counts: First, that “the defendant, James Freeman, on the-day of May, did unlawfully fish with a seine in the waters of the Cumberland river, against the peace and dignity of the State;” second, that “the said Jim Freeman, on the day and year aforesaid, in the county aforesaid, unlawfully did catch fish in the waters of the Cumberland river by a contrivance other than rod, line, or trot line, against the peace and dignity of the State.”

The defendant was found guilty by the court, who tried the case without the intervention of a jury.

The facts in the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Whim v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1906

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Pope v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1923
  2. French v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1929
  3. State Ex Rel. Scroggins v. RiceTennessee Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Wehunt v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1916
  5. Richards v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API