Pope v. State
Tennessee Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice McKinney
W. R. Pope, plaintiff in error, has appealed to this court from a judgment convicting him of transporting more than one gallon of intoxicating liquor.
The pertinent part of .the indictment, which is the basis of the errors assigned, is as follows:
“That W. R. Pope heretofore on the 22d day of May, 1923, in the county aforesaid,' did unlawfully and felo-niously transport intoxicating liquor in quantities of one gallon or more, from one place to another against the peace and dignity of the State.”
*178We baye before us only tbe technical record, and the presumption of guilt obtains:
The errors assigned…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Kizer v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1918
- Smartt and Carson v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1903
- Whim v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1906
- State v. CrockettTennessee Supreme Court · 1917
- State v. GreenTennessee Supreme Court · 1914
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Webster v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1967
- State of Tennessee v. Willie DuncanTennessee Supreme Court · 2016
- Carl Kimbro v. Lynn Bomar, Warden, Tennessee State PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1964
- Frazier v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1977
- Norris v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1971
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.