Legal Opinion

Whim v. State

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided April 15, 1906PublishedCited by 11 opinions

FHOM SHELBY. Appeal in error from the Criminal Conrt of Shelby County. — John T. Moss, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McAlister

The plaintiff in error was convicted of “knowingly, willfully, and maliciously cutting and removing for the purpose of marketing timber from the lands of another, without the consent of the owner of the timber so cut and removed,” in violation of the provisions of chapter 106, p. 257, of the Acts of 1897. The jury fixed the punishment of the prisoner at two years confinement in the State prison. He appealed, and has assigned errors. No part of the testimony has been preserved by the bill of exceptions, and the cause is here only upon the technical record, showing, among other things, the…

2Cited by11 opinions

  1. Crapo v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1939
  2. Pope v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1923
  3. French v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1929
  4. State Ex Rel. Scroggins v. RiceTennessee Supreme Court · 1929
  5. McKnight v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1937

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API