Shelton v. Krysl (In Re Krysl)
District Court, D. Oregon
1Opinion of the Court
AMENDED MEMORANDUM OPINION 1
ALBERT E. RADCLIFFE, Chief Judge.
Plaintiff has commenced this adversary proceeding against the defendants, debtors herein, seeking a determination that a debt allegedly owing by Defendants to a third party (from whom Plaintiff has acquired the debt) is excepted from Defendants’ discharge herein, or, in the alternative, that Defendants be denied a discharge in this bankruptcy proceeding.
Defendants have moved to dismiss this case for lack of standing. Defendants maintain that Plaintiff is unlawfully conducting the business of a collection agency as defined by Oregon…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Manhattan Factoring Corp. v. OrsburnSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1965
- Frutiger v. Department of RevenueOregon Supreme Court · 1974
- Zidell Marine Corp. v. West Painting, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
- Mountain Top Manufacturing Co. v. Business Factors Corp.Civil Court of the City of New York · 1963
- Reed v. Jackson County Citizens LeagueCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
3Cited by1 opinion
- Shelton v. WilsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006