Legal Opinion

Shelton v. Krysl (In Re Krysl)

District Court, D. Oregon

Decided January 16, 2004No. Bankruptcy No. 602-63514-AER7, Adversary No. 02-6244-AERPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

AMENDED MEMORANDUM OPINION 1

ALBERT E. RADCLIFFE, Chief Judge.

Plaintiff has commenced this adversary proceeding against the defendants, debtors herein, seeking a determination that a debt allegedly owing by Defendants to a third party (from whom Plaintiff has acquired the debt) is excepted from Defendants’ discharge herein, or, in the alternative, that Defendants be denied a discharge in this bankruptcy proceeding.

Defendants have moved to dismiss this case for lack of standing. Defendants maintain that Plaintiff is unlawfully conducting the business of a collection agency as defined by Oregon…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Manhattan Factoring Corp. v. OrsburnSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1965
  2. Frutiger v. Department of RevenueOregon Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Zidell Marine Corp. v. West Painting, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
  4. Mountain Top Manufacturing Co. v. Business Factors Corp.Civil Court of the City of New York · 1963
  5. Reed v. Jackson County Citizens LeagueCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Shelton v. WilsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API