Legal Opinion

Mountain Top Manufacturing Co. v. Business Factors Corp.

Civil Court of the City of New York

Decided June 7, 1963PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSamuel A. Spiegel, J.

This action has been submitted to the court for judgment on an agreed statement of facts. Findings of fact and conclusions of law have been waived.

Defendant is a factor and plaintiff, its client, is a foreign corporation which has never filed a certificate of authority in this State. The claim is one to recover the proceeds of certain accounts receivable, assigned to defendant but never collected by it, and which defendant charged back to plaintiff’s account.

The debtor of these accounts receivable refused to pay. Arbitration was resorted to between plaintiff and debtor and although plaintiff…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Duobond Corp. v. Congress Factors Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1976
  2. Exportos Apparel Group, Ltd. v. Chemical BankDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1984
  3. Danleigh Fabrics, Inc. v. Gaynor-Stafford Industries, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
  4. Shelton v. Krysl (In Re Krysl)District Court, D. Oregon · 2004
  5. Duobond Corp. v. Congress Factors Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API