Legal Opinion

Shelton v. Wilson

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided June 23, 2006No. 04-35658PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM **

Appellee Katherine Wilson owed $636.87 to ATEZ, an asbestos removal firm. On March 18, 2002, appellant Lee Shelton purchased the claim from ATEZ. Subsequently, Wilson and her husband, appellee Philip Krysl, filed for bankruptcy under chapter 7 in the Oregon Bankruptcy Court. Wilson and Krysl listed Shelton as an unsecured creditor. Shelton initiated an adversary proceeding seeking to bar discharge of his claim. Wilson and Krysl contended that Shelton lacked standing to bring the adversary proceeding because he was not, with respect to the claim at issue, a “creditor” within the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Buono v. NortonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
  2. Shelton v. Wilson (In re Wilson)District Court, D. Oregon · 2004
  3. Shelton v. Krysl (In Re Krysl)District Court, D. Oregon · 2004

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Girouard v. Cestaro (In re Cestaro)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Connecticut · 2019
  2. Bankers Healthcare Group, Inc. v. Bilfield (In re Bilfield)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API