Fleischner v. Florey
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBean, J.
It is urged on behalf of defendants that the county clerk holds public moneys coming into his hands as bailee and is not liable for their loss in the absence of negligence or fraud on his part. This is claimed particularly for the reason that the statute of this state does not prescribe an official bond for the county clerk but an undertaking.
By virtue of the statute of the state and the official undertaking of defendant Florey as county clerk, he and his surety undertook to “faithfully pay over, according to law, all moneys that may come into his hands by virtue of such office.” Sections…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- United States v. PrescottSupreme Court of the United States · 1845
- Boyden v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
- Tillinghast v. . MerrillNew York Court of Appeals · 1896
- United States v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1851
- Thompson v. Board of TrusteesIllinois Supreme Court · 1863
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Secretary of State v. Hanover InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1966
- Bonneville County v. Standard Accient InsuranceIdaho Supreme Court · 1937