Legal Opinion

Bonneville County v. Standard Accient Insurance

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided April 23, 1937No. 6401PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMorgan, C. J.

This action was commenced to recover $831.40 collected by respondent Hansen and not paid into the county treasury, as required by law. The facts necessary-to an understanding of the question of law presented are that Hansen' was assessor of Bonneville County and it was his official duty to collect and pay over to the county treasurer moneys due for personal property taxes and motor vehicle licenses; that Saturday, June 3, 1933, he collected, in cash, and, at the time his office was closed on that day, had in his possession, money arising from such taxes and licenses amounting to $831.40; that…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Smythe v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
  2. Tillinghast v. . MerrillNew York Court of Appeals · 1896
  3. Wiley v. City of SpartaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1922
  4. Bush v. Johnson CountyNebraska Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Fairchild v. HedgesWashington Supreme Court · 1896

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. TaylorIdaho Supreme Court · 1939
  2. State ex rel. O'Connell v. EngenWashington Supreme Court · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API