Legal Opinion

Secretary of State v. Hanover Insurance

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided February 9, 1966PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGoodwin, J.

The state brought five causes of action upon a fidelity bond and appeals from an adverse judgment entered upon a directed verdict.

The issue upon trial was whether certain officers, admittedly covered by the defendant’s bond, had caused the state “a loss of money * * * through any failure of official duty * * which was the condition of the bond.

While the state, as plaintiff, has the ultimate burden of proving that it lost money through the failure of its bonded officers to perform their duties properly (to account), it may, by putting on a prima facie case, require the defendant bonding…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Camp & DuPuy v. LautermanOregon Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Fleischner v. FloreyOregon Supreme Court · 1924
  3. State ex rel. O'Connell v. EngenWashington Supreme Court · 1962

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Strombeck v. Secretary of StateCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
  2. State Ex Rel. Ray Wells, Inc. v. HargreavesOregon Supreme Court · 1988
  3. State Ex Rel. Ray Wells, Inc. v. HargreavesOregon Supreme Court · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API