Immersion Corp. v. HTC Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
TARANTO, Circuit Judge.
This ease involves one necessary condition, under 35 U.S.C. § 120, for treating a patent application, filed as a continuation of an earlier application, as having the earlier application’s filing date, not its own filing date. That timing benefit shrinks the universe of “prior” ,art for determining validity. The condition at issue, as relevant here, is that the continuation application be “filed before the patenting” of the earlier application. The question is whether, for that condition to be met, the continuing application has to be filed at least one day before the…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Hanna v. PlumerSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Warner-Jenkinson Co. v. Hilton Davis Chemical Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1997
- National Labor Relations Board v. Bell Aerospace Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. SchorSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. LockeSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Great Concepts, LLC v. Chutter, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2023
- Great Concepts, LLC v. Chutter, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2024