Legal Opinion

People v. Moore

New York Court of Appeals

Decided December 26, 1985PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.

It is well settled in this State that "a guilty plea, once *1030withdrawn, 'is out of the case forever and for all purposes’ ” (People v Droz, 39 NY2d 457, 463, quoting People v Spitaleri, 9 NY2d 168, 173; accord, People v Burd, 18 NY2d 447, 450). This rule, which applies both to the fact of the plea and the contents of the plea allocution, prohibits the use of such material either on the People’s direct case (People v Spitaleri, supra) or for impeachment purposes should the defendant take the stand (People v…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. DrozNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
  2. People v. SpitaleriNew York Court of Appeals · 1961
  3. People v. EvansNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
  4. People v. HeffronAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
  5. People v. BurdNew York Court of Appeals · 1966

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. People v. CurdgelNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
  2. People v. LathamNew York Court of Appeals · 1997
  3. People v. HuntAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  4. Van Wie v. KirkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  5. People v. MooreAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API