Legal Opinion

People v. Evans

New York Court of Appeals

Decided December 14, 1982PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Jasen, J.

We are asked to decide whether a defendant, who, with the advice and in the presence of counsel, prior to entering into a plea bargain initiated by him, voluntarily furnishes the District Attorney a preplea incriminating statement and, subsequent to the plea and conviction, voluntarily testifies against a codefendant at his trials, is entitled to preclude the People from using any of these statements against him at a subsequent trial ordered by the Appellate Division following suppression of statements made by defendant at the time of his arrest.

On February…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Kercheval v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  2. Harrison v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. United States v. CeccoliniSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. People v. ThomasNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
  5. People v. McConnellNew York Court of Appeals · 1980

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. People v. PelchatNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
  2. People v. DodtNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
  3. People v. CampbellNew York Court of Appeals · 1989
  4. People v. CurdgelNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
  5. People v. SobotkerNew York Court of Appeals · 1984

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API