Legal Opinion

Linforth v. San Francisco Gas & Electric Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 27, 1908No. Civ. No. 498PublishedCited by 7 opinions

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco, retaxing costs. Thomas F. Graham, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtChipman, P. J.

This is an appeal from an order by the superior court of the city and county of San Francisco, made after final judgment, re taxing plaintiff’s costs. The total amount set forth in the memorandum is $260.15. The order may be reviewed. (Southern Cal. Ry. Co. v. Superior Court, 127 Cal. 417, [59 Pac. 789]; Elledge v. Superior Court, 131 Cal. 279, [63 Pac. 360].)

On the hearing of the question, and after some testimony was taken, the court ordered “that the said motion to tax costs be, and the same is hereby granted at the sum of $160.15.” The court scaled the cost bill by a lump sum, making it…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Bathgate v. IrvineCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  2. McGlauflin v. WormserMontana Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Crawford v. AbrahamOregon Supreme Court · 1866
  4. Southern California Railway Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  5. Hanchett v. HumphreyU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Nevada · 1899

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Hennessy v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Markart v. ZeimerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
  3. Naylor v. AdamsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1911
  4. Del Mar Canning Co. v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.California Court of Appeal · 1941
  5. Ray v. ClarkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API