Legal Opinion
IBT/HERE Employee Representatives' Council v. Gate Gourmet Division Americas
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided June 30, 2005No. Civil Action No.: 05-1210 (RMU)PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
URBINA, District Judge.
Denying the Plaintiff’s Motion for a Temporary Restraining Order
I. INTRODUCTION
This matter comes before the court 1 on the motion of IBT/HERE 2 Employee Representatives’ Council (the “Union”) for a temporary restraining order. The Union represents employees of Gate Gourmet, Inc. (the “Company”) 3 and seeks to enjoin the Company from its announced plan to eliminate employer contributions to the Company’s health care plan (the “Plan”) beginning July 1, 2005. The Union argues that the court should prevent the Company from eliminating its contributions…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Mazurek v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Commission v. Holiday Tours, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1977
- Hawaiian Airlines, Inc. v. NorrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- International Ass'n of MacHinists v. StreetSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Consolidated Rail Corporation v. Railway Labor Executives' Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Atlas Air, Inc. v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- Brown v. Federal Bureau of InvestigationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Allied Pilots Association v. American Airlines, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2009
- BNSF Railway Company v. International Association of Sheet Metal Air Rail and Transportation WorkersDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2022
- Brown v. Federal Bureau of InvestigationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011