Legal Opinion
Bird v. Alanson M. Randol, D.D.S., P.C.
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided February 19, 2025No. 6:23-cv-01678Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON EUGENE DIVISION LACEY BIRD and Case No. 6:23-cv-01678-MC ALISHIA EGENHOFF, OPINION AND ORDER Plaintiffs, v. ALANSON M. RANDOL, D.D.S., P.C., a professional corporation, and ALANSON M. RANDOL, an individual, Defendants. __________________________________ MCSHANE, Judge: Plaintiffs Lacey Bird and Alishia Egenhoff bring this religious discrimination action against their former employer, Defendants Alanson M. Randol, D.D.S., P.C. (“the Clinic”) and Dr. Alanson M. Randol. Plaintiffs allege that Defendants violated Title VII of the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Hunt v. CromartieSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Richard D. Peterson v. Hewlett-Packard Co., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.