Richard D. Peterson v. Hewlett-Packard Co., a Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
REINHARDT, Circuit Judge:
In this religious discrimination action under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq. and Idaho law, Richard Peterson claims that his former employer, the HewletL-Packard Company, engaged in disparate treatment by terminating him on account of his religious views and that it failed to accommodate his religious beliefs. The district court granted Hewlett-Packard’s motion for summary judgment on the grounds that: 1) Peterson failed to raise an inference of disparate treatment and 2) accommodating Peterson’s beliefs would inflict undue…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Oncale v. Sundowner Offshore Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Franks v. Bowman Transportation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Romer v. EvansSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Trans World Airlines, Inc. v. HardisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by314 opinions
- Sergio E. Fonseca v. Sysco Food Services of Arizona, Inc., a Delaware For-Profit CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Kumar v. Gate Gourmet, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2014
- Evelyn Bodett, Wife David Bodett, Husband v. Coxcom, Inc., a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Whitman v. MinetaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Daniel M. Berry v. Department of Social Services, Tehama County Bill Snelson, DirectorCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
309 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.