In re Pincus
District Court, S.D. New York
In Bankruptcy. On objections to petition for discharge.
1Opinion of the Court
HOUGH, District Judge.
These bankrupts filed with the referee in charge, and about five months after adjudication, the petition under review. No action by the court was taken thereon, until more than a year after adjudication, and the objecting creditors now contend that the filing with the referee was insufficient to confer jurisdiction, and the petition should be dismissed as not having been preferred within the statutory year. It is true that the referee “as referee” has no power to consider the petition. Collier on Bank. (5th Ed.) p. 171. But within this district, and by force of district…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- In re MeyerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1899
- In re Dresser & Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1905
- In re L. Stein & Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1904
- In re DresserCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1906
- In re HaleDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1901
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Liberty Nat. Bank of Roanoke, Va. v. BearSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- Horner v. HamnerCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1918
- Newsome v. Culp (In Re Culp)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 1992
- In re RussellCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1910
- In re ShafferDistrict Court, N.D. West Virginia · 1909
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.