Legal Opinion
In re Hale
District Court, E.D. North Carolina
Decided February 21, 1901PublishedCited by 10 opinions
In Bankruptcy. On petition for discharge.
1Opinion of the Court
PURNELL, District Judge.
The firm of Hale Bros., engaged in a general mercantile business, having two stores,—one at Halifax and one at Tiilery, in Halifax county. The firm was composed of L. H. Hale and Mary C. Hale. B. H. Hale, husband of Mary C. Hale, managed the business at Tillery. The same is now before me on a petition for final discharge, and objections thereto. An examination of the record shows the following facts: March 20, 1899, petition filed, “L. H. Hale and Mary C. Hale, Partners Trading as Hale Bros.” Petitioners ate creditors of Hale Bros. Hale Bros, insolvent, and Hale Bros,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- In re MeyerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1899
- In re BardenDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1900
- Strause v. HooperDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1901
3Cited by10 opinions
- Liberty Nat. Bank of Roanoke, Va. v. BearSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- In re BertenshawCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1907
- Horner v. HamnerCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1918
- First Nat. Bank of Herkimer v. Poland UnionCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1940
- Ludowici Roofing Tile Co. v. Pennsylvania Inst. for Instruction of the BlindCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1903
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.