Fort Wayne, Cincinnati & Louisville Railroad v. Haberkorn
Indiana Court of Appeals
From the Allen Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtGavin, J.
Appellee sued to recover royalties, or the value of the right to make and use certain pat*480ented appliances. The only questions argued are those presented by the motion for a new trial.
Counsel for appellant insist that the complaint is not for royalties, nor to recover the value of a license granted, but that it seeks to recover the value or price of a “transfer of a right in each patent,” and that the complaint is not supported by proof of a license;
There are various paragraphs of complaint, but all are substantially similar, save that they set up different patents.
The averments in each…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Waterman v. MacKenzieSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Tilghman v. ProctorSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Solomons v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Coupe v. RoyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Mitchell v. HawleySupreme Court of the United States · 1873
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Michels v. Dyna-Kote Industries, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1986
- State Exchange Bank v. PaulIndiana Court of Appeals · 1915
- Eclipse Wind Engine Co. v. Zimmerman Manufacturing Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1896
- Hutton v. City of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 1924
- Western Pac R.R. Corp. v. Western Pac. R. Co. Metzger v. Western Pac. R. Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1952
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.