Legal Opinion · Dissent

Western Pac R.R. Corp. v. Western Pac. R. Co. Metzger v. Western Pac. R. Co.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided September 11, 1952No. 12506_1Published

1DissentJames Alger Fee, District Judge

There are no findings of fact which support the judgment of the Trial Court or the affirmance thereof by a majority of this Court.1 The cause should be remanded for *1007this reason alone.2 The Trial Court gives two reasons for decision against plaintiff: first, that the “tax escape” was a fraud on the government, and, second, that a recovery would violate the reorganization decree. Neither has any validity.

The major portion of the opinion of the Trial Court is devoted to the proposition that the “tax escape” was a fraud upon the government,3 and therefore the proceeds were given to the defendant,…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Commissioner v. SunnenSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  2. Diaz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  3. United States v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  4. Kelley v. Everglades Drainage DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  5. Terry v. . MungerNew York Court of Appeals · 1890

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API