Boone v. Iowa & Minnesota Construction Co.
United States Circuit Court
Motion to Bemand.
1Opinion of the CourtMcCrary, C. J.
That the intervening petition, filed in this case in the state court by George Boone and Francis E. Hinckley, presents a controversy between citizens of Illinois on one side and citizens of Iowa on t-be other side, is conceded. But it is insisted that the case was, nevertheless, not removable, because the petition of intervention is a supplementary proceeding, so connected with the original proceeding as to form an incident to it, and substantially a continuation of it. To determine whether or not this is so we must look to the record. The proceedings in the state court were instituted in…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Gaines v. FuentesSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Kern v. HuidekoperSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
- Barrow v. HuntonSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- Connor v. ScottU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Arkansas · 1876
- Merchants' & Manufacturers' Nat. Bank v. WheelerU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1875
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- American Nat. Bank of Denver v. National Benefit & Casualty Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Colorado · 1895