Legal Opinion

Kern v. Huidekoper

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided April 11, 1881No. 538PublishedCited by 136 opinions

Ebbok to the Circuit Court of the .United States for the Northern District of Illinois. The factij are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Woods

This was an action of replevin. brought by Frederick W. Huidekoper, John N. Dennison, and Thomas W. Shannon, in the Circuit Court of Cook County, Illinois, at its May Term. 1877, to wit, on May 22,1877, against Charles Kern, to recover the possession of one thousand tons of old railroad iron, which as they claimed he wrongfully detained from them.

The writ of replevin, issued May 23,1877, was on the same day served by the coroner of the county, who received from the plaintiffs a statutory bond, and delivered to them the possession of the iron. The summons was made returnable at the next term…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Virginia v. RivesSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  2. Railway Co. v. Whitton's AdministratorSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
  3. Meyer v. Construction CompanySupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  4. Buck v. ColbathSupreme Court of the United States · 1866
  5. Gaines v. FuentesSupreme Court of the United States · 1876

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by136 opinions

  1. Madisonville Traction Company v. Saint Bernard Mining CompanySupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  2. Railroad Co. v. KoontzSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
  3. Stone v. South CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  4. Roman Catholic Archdiocese of San Juan v. Acevedo FelicianoSupreme Court of the United States · 2020
  5. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. McCabeSupreme Court of the United States · 1909

131 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API