Legal Opinion
Keith and Beverly Langland, on Behalf of Their Daughter, M.L.] v. Secretary of Helath and Human Services
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided February 26, 2013No. 07-36VPublishedCited by 62 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Vaccine Act off-table case; Althen-, DTaP; celiac disease; absence of plausible medical theory of causation; statements of treating physicians; document referenced in expert report as party admission; no appropriate temporal association without reputable explanation of mechanism.
OPINION AND ORDER 1
WOLSKI, Judge.
Petitioners Keith and Beverly Langland have moved for a review of Special Master Richard B. Abell’s decision that petitioners are not entitled to compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-10-300aa-34 (“Vaccine Act” or “Act”). The petition…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Althen v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
- Moberly v. Secretary of Health & Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2010
- Andreu Ex Rel. Andreu v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by62 opinions
- Holmes v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
- Lamare v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
- R.K. Ex Rel. A.K. v. Secretary of the Department of Health & Human ServicesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
- Tarsell v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017
- A. v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2020
57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.