Legal Opinion

City of Cleveland v. Maistros

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided September 24, 2001No. 79007Published

1Opinion of the Court

Colleen Conway Cooney, Judge.

Defendant-appellant Joseph Maistros appeals his conviction in the Cleveland Municipal Court for importuning, in violation of R.C. 2907.07(B). Maistros asserts that the trial court erred in denying his motion to dismiss because R.C. 2907.07(B) violates the Equal Protection Clause of the United States Constitution. For the reasons below, we reverse Maistros’s conviction and vacate his sentence.

On November 8, 1999, Maistros, a student at Cleveland State University (“CSU”), sexually propositioned another male student, while the student was in a restroom stall using…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. F. S. Royster Guano Co. v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  2. Rinaldi v. YeagerSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Gaines v. Preterm-Cleveland, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1987
  4. State v. WilliamsOhio Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Bing v. ThunigNew York Court of Appeals · 1957

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API