Legal Opinion

(HC) Crockett v. Hill

District Court, E.D. California

Decided February 3, 2020No. 2:20-cv-00213Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 LEON WILSON CROCKETT, No. 2:20-cv-0213 KJN P 12 Petitioner, 13 v. ORDER 14 RICK HILL, Warden, 15 Respondent. 16 17 18 I. Introduction 19 Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus 20 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241, together with a request to proceed in forma pauperis. 21 Examination of the affidavit reveals petitioner is unable to afford the costs of this action. 22 Accordingly, leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). 23 As…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Rhines v. WeberSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  2. Blackledge v. AllisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Mayle v. FelixSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  4. Andreas Kelly v. Larry Small, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  5. King v. RyanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API