Legal Opinion

Nathan v. Lee

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided February 24, 1899No. 18,234PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Erom the Dearborn Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtJordan, J.

Appellee is the receiver of the G. T. Roots Company, a foreign corporation, incorporated under the laws of the state of Ohio, and, prior to the suspension of its business, as hereinafter stated, its principal office was located at the city of Cincinnati, Ohio. The purpose for which this corporation was created was to manufacture, purchase, and deal in flour, grain, salt, and other merchandise, for profit. To further the object of its incorporation, it became the owner of and operated a large flouring mill and cooper shops, situated on certain described real estate in the city of Lawrenceburg,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Warren v. First National Bank of ColumbusIllinois Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Catlin v. Wilcox Silver-Plate Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Saint Nicholas Bank v. State National BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
  4. Rhawn v. PearceIllinois Supreme Court · 1884
  5. Levering v. BimelIndiana Supreme Court · 1897

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Sinclair v. GunzenhauserIndiana Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Baltimore & Ohio Southwestern Railway Co. v. ReedIndiana Supreme Court · 1902
  3. Morris v. City of IndianapolisIndiana Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Nappanee Canning Co. v. Reid, Murdoch & Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1902
  5. E. C. Warner Co. v. W. B. Foshay Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1932

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API