McAlpine v. Multnomah County
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtDe Muniz, P. J.
In these consolidated negligence actions, plaintiffs appeal from a judgment dismissing their complaints for failure to state ultimate facts sufficient to constitute a claim. ORCP 21 A(8). The issue is whether defendant Multnomah County may be held liable for the harm plaintiffs suffered at the hands of Charlesworth, a parolee, based on section 319 of the Restatement (Second) of Torts (1974), or because defendant’s actions created a reasonably foreseeable risk that plaintiffs would suffer such harm. We reverse.
Previously, we affirmed the dismissal of plaintiff Robert McAlpine’s complaint…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Fazzolari v. Portland School District No. 1JOregon Supreme Court · 1987
- Buchler v. Oregon Corrections Div.Oregon Supreme Court · 1993
- Erickson v. ChristensonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989
- McAlpine v. Multnomah CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
- Faverty v. McDonald's Restaurants of Oregon, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Hayes Oyster Co. v. DulcichCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
- McPherson v. State Ex Rel. Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007
- Knepper v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
- Panpat v. Owens-Brockway Glass Container, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
- Sande v. City of PortlandCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.