Legal Opinion
McAlpine v. Multnomah County
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided October 26, 1994No. C93-0353CV; CA A80998PublishedCited by 45 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLeeson, J.
Plaintiff appeals a judgment dismissing his complaint against defendants City of Portland and Regional Organized Crime Narcotics Agency for failure to state a claim. We affirm.
In reviewing a dismissal for failure to state a claim, we are limited to the facts stated in the complaint. Erickson v. Christenson, 99 Or App 104, 106, 781 P2d 383 (1989), rev dismissed 311 Or 266 (1991). We accept as true the allegations in the complaint and all reasonable inferences that may be drawn from them. Glubka v. Long, 115 Or App 236, 238, 837 P2d 553 (1992). A pleading that contains an allegation of material…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Fazzolari v. Portland School District No. 1JOregon Supreme Court · 1987
- Buchler v. Oregon Corrections Div.Oregon Supreme Court · 1993
- Nearing v. WeaverOregon Supreme Court · 1983
- Erickson v. ChristensonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989
- Sanders v. Oregon Pacific States InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1992
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by45 opinions
- Faverty v. McDonald's Restaurants of Oregon, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
- Yeager v. Providence Health System OregonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
- Brown v. Boise Cascade Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
- Association of Unit Owners of Bridgeview Condominiums v. DunningCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
- George v. MyersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.