Legal Opinion
Vikesh Datt SHARMA; Vijanti Devi Sharma, Petitioners, v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided July 16, 1996No. 95-70385PublishedCited by 154 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BEEZER, Circuit Judge:
We consider whether Petitioners are entitled to a rescission of deportation orders entered in absentia.
I
Petitioners are natives and citizens of Fiji who entered the United States without inspection. After the Immigration and Naturalization Service (“INS”) issued an order to show cause why Petitioners should not be deported, Petitioners appeared before an Immigration Judge (“IJ”) and conceded deport-ability. A December 5, 1994 hearing was set to consider Petitioners’ applications for asylum. Petitioners were informed, orally and in writing, that they would be deported if…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. AbuduSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. DohertySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Landon v. PlasenciaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Farid Faham Gamal Ghaly v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- Radzanower v. Touche Ross & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by154 opinions
- Navaratwam Kamalthas v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Tigran Ekimian Rouzan Nagapetian Avetis Hekimian v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Ranjit Singh v. Immigration and Naturalization ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Perez v. MukaseyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Carlos Humberto Ordonez v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
149 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.