Legal Opinion
Gaubert v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided July 26, 1993No. 90-434CPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
NETTESHEIM, Judge.
The case is before the court after argument on defendant’s motion to dismiss pursuant to RCFC 12(b)(1). Defendant argues that the court lacks jurisdiction over plaintiff’s complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1500 (1988), which precludes plaintiff from filing suit in the United States Court of Federal Claims once plaintiff files another action based on the same operative facts in another federal court.
FACTS
The following facts derive from plaintiff’s complaint or are otherwise undisputed. In January 1983 Thomas M. Gaubert (“plaintiff”) purchased a controlling interest in…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- United States v. GaubertSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Keene Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Johns-Manville Corporation and Johns-Manville Sales Corporation v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- Unr Industries, Inc., Unarco Industries, Inc., and Eagle Picher Industries, Inc. v. The United States, Keene Corporation v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1992
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Branch v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1993
- Davis v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
- Allstate Financial Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1993
- One Day Paint & Body Centers, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1993