Legal Opinion

Pilgrim's Pride Corp. v. Commissioner

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided February 25, 2015No. 14-60295PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JENNIFER WALKER ELROD, Circuit Judge:

In this tax case, we must determine whether Pilgrim’s Pride Corporation’s loss from its abandonment of securities is an ordinary loss or a capital loss. The Tax Court—in what appears to be the first ruling of its kind by any court—ruled that 26 U.S.C. § 1234A(1) applies to the abandonment loss and requires that it be classified as capital. We disagree. Because § 1234A(1) only applies to the termination of contractual or derivative rights, and not to the abandonment of capital assets, we REVERSE the judgment of the Tax Court and RENDER judgment in favor of…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Gross v. FBL Financial Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Reiter v. Sonotone Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Reiter v. Sonotone Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Merck & Co. v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  5. United States v. CraftSupreme Court of the United States · 2002

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Husky International Electronics, Inc. v. Ritz (In re Ritz)Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2015
  2. Estate of Andrew J. McKelvey v. Commr. of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2018
  3. CRI-Leslie, LLC v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 2016
  4. Villarreal v. HornDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2016
  5. Husky International Elec, Inc. v. Daniel RitzCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2015

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API