State Ex Rel. Gonzales v. Manzagol
New Mexico Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
OMAN, Justice.
Petitioner Gonzales sought to have Respondents Manzagol, State Personnel Director (Director), and Reynolds, State Engineer (Engineer), prohibited from discharging Petitioner from his employment by the State. He failed in the district court, and has appealed. We affirm.
At all material times, Petitioner was a resident and duly qualified elector of the City and County of Sante Fe and an employee of the State of New Mexico as a Water Resource Assistant in the Office of the Engineer. This was a non-exempt (classified) position under the State Personnel Act, §§ 5-4 — 28 to 5-4-…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Cantwell v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- McGowan v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. ButtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Garcia on Behalf of Garcia v. La FargeNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1995
- State v. GattisNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1986
- Cummings v. GodinSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1977
- Otero v. ZouharNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1984
- Acevedo v. City of North PoleAlaska Supreme Court · 1983
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.