Legal Opinion

Rielly v. Arnsmeier

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided March 3, 1936PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMartin, J.

The plaintiff, hereinafter referred to as respondent, brought this action for the foreclosure of a certain real-estate mortgage in the principal sum of $1,800, which mortgage and the note secured thereby he purchased from one Amelia Ayers. The defendant, A. O. Arnsmeier, hereinafter referred to as the appellant, contends that his $5,500 mortgage, to which reference will be hereinafter made, and which covers the same piece of property, constituted a prior lien.

From the findings of fact made by the trial court, it appears that on January 23, 1915, Elizabeth Raster, William T. Raster, her son,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Wisconsin Trust Co. v. CousinsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Rosendale State Bank v. HollandWisconsin Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Sexton v. PickettWisconsin Supreme Court · 1869
  4. Kidder v. PueschnerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Bauer v. Franklin State BankWisconsin Supreme Court · 1934

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. MGIC Financial Corp. v. H. A. Briggs Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1979
  2. Kallas v. B&G REALTYCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1992
  3. Auto Acceptance & Loan Corp. v. TausWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
  4. River Bank of De Soto v. FisherWisconsin Supreme Court · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API