Legal Opinion
Clark v. E! Entertainment Television, LLC
District Court, M.D. Tennessee
Decided October 10, 2014No. 3:13-00058PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
KEVIN H. SHARP, District Judge.
After a final judgment was entered in accordance with this Court’s Order and Memorandum dismissing the Amended Complaint because Plaintiffs claims were time-barred, Plaintiff Corey Clark filed a “Motion to Vacate the District Courtis Order and Judgment in its Entirety Pursuant to Rules 59 and 60.” (Docket No. 93). Defendants E! Entertainment Television LLC (“E!”) and Fox Broadcasting Company have filed responses in opposition, to which Plaintiff has replied. (Docket Nos. 95, 95 & 99).
For the reasons that follow, the Court will grant Plaintiffs Motion…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Curtis Publishing Co. v. ButtsSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Milkovich v. Lorain Journal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Harte-Hanks Communications, Inc. v. ConnaughtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Murray v. Chagrin Valley Publishing Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2014
- S.E. ex rel. Mitchell v. ChmerkovskiyDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2016