Legal Opinion

Harte-Hanks Communications, Inc. v. Connaughton

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided June 22, 1989No. 88-10PublishedCited by 939 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Stevens

A public figure may not recover damages for a defamatory falsehood without clear and convincing proof that the false “statement was made with ‘actual malice’ — that is, with knowledge that it was false or with reckless disregard of whether it was false or not.” New York Times Co. v. Sullivan, 376 U. S. 254, 279-280 (1964). See Curtis Publishing Co. v. Butts, 388 U. S. 130, 162 (1967) (opinion of Warren, C. J.). In Bose Corp. v. Consumers Union of United States, Inc., 466 U. S. 485 (1984), we held that judges in such cases have a constitutional duty to “exercise independent judgment and…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. ButtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Miller v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Bose Corp. v. Consumers Union of United States, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by939 opinions

  1. Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. Hernandez v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. In the Interest of J.F.C.Texas Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Milkovich v. Lorain Journal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
  5. Kolstad v. American Dental Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999

934 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API