Legal Opinion

In Re Beal

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 6, 1931PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Pee Oukiam:.

The question of law involved appears from the following findings of fact and judgment entered by the trial judge:

“This cause came on for trial, and during the progress of the trial, and before more than one witness had completed her testimony it was suggested to the court by counsel present, that the propounder to the will was represented by counsel, to wit, Senator P. W. Glidewell, of Reidsville; that the court had previously inquired if the propounder was represented by counsel, and was informed by counsel for the caveator that he knew of no counsel representing the propounder.

Th…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bird v. Bradburn.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1902
  2. Likas v. LackeySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
  3. Abernethy v. Yount.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1905

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Goodman v. . GoodmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
  2. Brantley v. . CollieSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
  3. In Re BlairSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API