Legal Opinion

In Re Dirks

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided March 14, 1995No. C2-94-2200PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MARTIN J. MANSUR, Judge. *

Appellant stipulated to his initial commitment as mentally ill and dangerous to the public. After the security hospital filed its report, a review hearing was held. The trial court concluded appellant was chemically dependent and continued to be mentally ill and dangerous to the public. It committed appellant to the Minnesota Security Hospital for an indeterminate period. David Dirks appeals; we affirm.

FACTS

After appellant went on a “rampage” at the house in which he was living, and attempted suicide by shooting himself in the chest, a social worker filed a…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Lidberg v. SteffenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1994
  2. Matter of MalmCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
  3. Matter of JasmerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
  4. In Re LufskyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
  5. Matter of SchauerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1990

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Adam Christopher Robb.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2014
  2. In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Ingram OyugiCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API