Legal Opinion
Lidberg v. Steffen
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided April 1, 1994No. C1-92-1129PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PAGE, Justice.
Respondent brought a petition before the supreme court appeal panel seeking full discharge from his commitment as mentally ill and dangerous (MI & D). Minn.Stat. § 253B.18, subd. 15 (1992). 1 The appeal panel denied respondent’s petition, but granted him a provisional discharge to a Rule 36 structured living facility, if he so desired. Respondent did not enter the Rule 36 facility. Instead, he appealed the denial of his full discharge to the court of appeals. The court of appeals held that the statutory procedures for discharge from commitment as MI & D denied respondent…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Addington v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Plyler v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Foucha v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Jackson v. IndianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Reiter v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2001
- Call v. GomezSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
- In re P.T.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2003
- Irwin v. GoodnoCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2004
- Meriwether Minnesota Land & Timber, LLC v. StateCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2012
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.