Legal Opinion

In Re Lufsky

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided June 10, 1986No. CX-86-455PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

NIERENGARTEN, Judge.

Lufsky appeals his commitment to Minnesota Security Hospital as a mentally ill and dangerous person.

We affirm.

FACTS

Lufsky has been repeatedly hospitalized for psychiatric treatments since 1971. His October 1985 commitment to the Minnesota Security Hospital as a mentally ill person was affirmed by this court. In Re Lufsky, 379 N.W.2d 255 (Minn.Ct.App.1986). That commitment was precipitated by Lufsky’s violent attack upon his parents, which included wrapping an electrical cord around his father’s neck and dragging him from the house.

Lufsky was discharged, without…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In Re LufskyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Matter of KottkeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
  2. Matter of SchauerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1990
  3. In Re DirksCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995
  4. Matter of GrafstromCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1992
  5. In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Ingram OyugiCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API