Legal Opinion

Pekin Ins. Co. v. Estate of Goben

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided March 9, 1999No. 5-98-0189PublishedCited by 56 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Maag

The plaintiff, Pekin Insurance Company (Pekin), filed a complaint for declaratory judgment against the defendant, the estate of Robin M. Goben, deceased (Estate), seeking a declaration that Robin did not qualify as an insured under the automobile liability policy issued to the partnership of Gary Whitlock and Frank Goben, doing business as Freedom Heating & Air Conditioning Company (the Company). The trial court entered summary judgment in favor of the Estate and against Pekin, finding that the Pekin policy provided underinsuredmotorist coverage to the Estate and that such coverage could be…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Crum & Forster Managers Corp. v. Resolution Trust Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1993
  2. American States Insurance v. KolomsIllinois Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Cates v. CatesIllinois Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Squire v. Economy Fire & Casualty Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Bruder v. Country Mutual InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1993

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by56 opinions

  1. Grinnell Mutual Reinsurance Co. v. HaightCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2012
  2. Johnson v. DavisAppellate Court of Illinois · 2007
  3. Farmers Automobile Insurance v. Country Mutual InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 2000
  4. Lee v. Allstate Life InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 2005
  5. Wallis v. Country Mutual InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 2000

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API