Legal Opinion

Bruder v. Country Mutual Insurance

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided June 17, 1993No. 74155PublishedCited by 104 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Freeman

This case involves the question of whether uninsured motorist coverage under two insurance policies issued by Country Mutual Insurance Company (Country Mutual) may be “stacked,” or aggregated.

BACKGROUND

In May 1986, Ruth Bruder, then pregnant, was injured when the automobile she was driving was struck from the rear. Either or both of the drivers of the two other vehicles involved in the accident were at fault. Neither of those drivers was insured.

Bruder gave birth, prematurely, to a daughter, Halie, who suffers from cerebral palsy. It is a matter of dispute as to whether Halie’s condition was…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Commonwealth Coatings Corp. v. Continental Casualty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Glidden v. Farmers Automobile InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Squire v. Economy Fire & Casualty Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1977
  4. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. SheltonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1988
  5. Morelock v. Millers' Mutual InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1971

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by104 opinions

  1. Hobbs v. Hartford Ins. Co. of the MidwestIllinois Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Lapham-Hickey Steel Corp. v. Protection Mutual InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Robert Wehrle v. Cincinnati Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2013
  4. Allen v. Transamerica InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
  5. Nationwide Agribusiness Insura v. Toni DuganCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2015

99 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API