People ex rel. C. H. Little Co. v. Grant
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Wayne; Frazer, J. Assumpsit by the people of the State of Michigan, for the use and benefit of the C. H. Little Company, against James Grant as principal, and Julius Porath and John A. Mercier as sureties, upon a statutory bond. There was judgment for plaintiff on a verdict directed by the court, and defendants bring error.
1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, J.
This is an action of assumpsit, brought in the name of the people of the State of Michigan, for the use and benefit of the C. H. Little Company, a corporation, against James Grant as principal, and Julius Porath and John A. Mercier as sureties, upon a statutory bond, under the provisions of Act No. 94 of the Public Acts of the State of Michigan for the year 1883, and the amendments thereto, given in connection with a contract made between the city of Detroit and James Grant on the 16th day of August, 1901, for the repaving *27of an alley in said city of Detroit, known as “ Alley No. 45,” between…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Grasser & Brand Brewing Co. v. RogersMichigan Supreme Court · 1897
- People ex rel. Holmes v. SheehanMichigan Supreme Court · 1898
3Cited by11 opinions
- American Woolen Co. v. MaagetSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1912
- People Ex Rel. Michigan Electric Supply Co. v. Vandenburg Electric Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1955
- Mauro v. DavieMichigan Supreme Court · 1926
- Gardner v. Le FevreMichigan Supreme Court · 1914
- Grant v. FletcherDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1922
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.