Legal Opinion

Grasser & Brand Brewing Co. v. Rogers

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 17, 1897PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Case made from Clare; Dodds, J. Assumpsit by the Grasser & Brand Brewing Company against Jay R. Rogers and Alfred J. Doherty, as surety, upon a contract for the purchase of goods. From a judgment for defendants on verdict directed by the court, plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J.

March 20, 1890, the plaintiff made a contract with defendant Rogers to sell him “all the lager beer he may need, in car lots, at five dollars per barrel, delivered on board the cars at the city of Toledo, at the rate and price of five dollars per barrel.” Rogers, on his part, agreed to use his best endeavors to market the beer, ‘ ‘ and that he will pay for the beer so delivered, in car lots, by remittance or honoring and paying drafts drawn on him therefor, in such manner that he * * * shall not be *113indebted to said Grasser & Brand Brewing Company at any one time for more than the price of one…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Bullock v. TaylorMichigan Supreme Court · 1878
  2. Johnston v. Township of KimballMichigan Supreme Court · 1878
  3. Locke v. McVeanMichigan Supreme Court · 1876
  4. J. A. Fay & Co. v. Jenks & Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1892
  5. Ferguson v. DavisMichigan Supreme Court · 1887

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. American Woolen Co. v. MaagetSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1912
  2. People Ex Rel. Michigan Electric Supply Co. v. Vandenburg Electric Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Mauro v. DavieMichigan Supreme Court · 1926
  4. People ex rel. C. H. Little Co. v. GrantMichigan Supreme Court · 1905
  5. Union Trust Co. v. Detroit Motor Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1898

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API