Legal Opinion

Gardner v. Le Fevre

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 7, 1914No. Docket No. 118PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Error to Muskegon; Sullivan, J. Replevin by John H. Gardner against George Le Fevre for an automobile. Judgment for defendant on a directed verdict, Plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J.

In 1911, the plaintiff, who owned an automobile, a Thomas flyer, then at Tecumseh, Mich., made an arrangement with one Eyke, who owned a garage at Muskegon, to the effect that the automobile would be shipped by rail to Muskegon, and would be received by Mr. Eyke and put in repair for the plaintiff. The automobile was shipped, and upon its arrival in Muskegon Mr. Eyke paid freight upon it to the railroad company, amounting to $83.60. He also furnished an extra tire, which was strapped into the receptacle for extra tires on the side of the machine. The charge for the tire was $50.75.

All this…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Caldwell v. LawrenceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1860
  2. People ex rel. C. H. Little Co. v. GrantMichigan Supreme Court · 1905
  3. People ex rel. Holmes v. SheehanMichigan Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Pearsons v. TinckerSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1853
  5. De Witt v. PrescottMichigan Supreme Court · 1883

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Theiler v. Consolidated Indemnity & Insurance Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Cleveland Auto Top & Trimming Co. v. American Finance Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1931
  3. State v. ParkerUtah Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Joy Oil Co. v. Fruehauf Trailer Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1947
  5. Grand Rapids Realty Co. v. RogersMichigan Supreme Court · 1947

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API