Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

State Ex Rel. Ewing v. a Motion Picture Film Entitled "Without a Stitch"

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided July 9, 1971No. 6877Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partBkown, J.

I concur in the granting of the permanent injunction against defendants and the other remedial relief provided by E. C. Chapter 3767 and stated in the last paragraph of the majority opinion, and accept the excellent analysis of the law leading to the final judgment, ,but I dissent from1 that part of the judgment which, orders the defendants to account for the box. office receipts arising from the exhibition of the film from the date of the Common Pleas Court’s injunction on September 19, 1970, up to and including the final performance.

The only hinge upon which such an accounting order for box…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. United States v. LovettSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. Kingsley Books, Inc. v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  3. E. B. Elliott Adv. Co., Henry F. Hill, Intervenor-Appellant v. Metropolitan Dade County, a Political Subdivision of the State of FloridaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
  4. State v. 1920 Studebaker Touring CarOregon Supreme Court · 1926
  5. White v. MasseeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1927

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API