Legal Opinion

Klinke v. Mitsubishi Motors Corp.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 31, 1998No. Docket Nos. 107730-107732, Calendar No. 2PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWeaver, J.

We granted leave to decide whether the Michigan Vehicle Code’s seat belt statute, which makes evidence of a plaintiff’s failure to use a seat belt admissible and imposes a five-percent cap on reduction in comparative negligence, is applicable in a products liability action against an automobile manufacturer. We conclude that the Michigan Vehicle Code statute, with its five-percent cap on damages reduction, is not applicable in a products liability action and affirm the Court of Appeals.

i

On June 25, 1988, plaintiff’s twenty-three-year-old daughter, Kimberly Marie Klinke, was killed in a…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Placek v. City of Sterling HeightsMichigan Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Jennings v. SouthwoodMichigan Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Maki v. City of East TawasMichigan Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Chandler v. Dowell Schlumberger Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Shallal v. Catholic Social ServicesMichigan Supreme Court · 1997

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Hodges v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Marketos v. American Employers InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Poppen v. ToveyMichigan Court of Appeals · 2003
  4. State v. OlsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
  5. BJ'S & SONS CONST. CO., INC. v. Van SickleMichigan Court of Appeals · 2005

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API