Legal Opinion

Faris v. State

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided February 27, 2009No. 22A05-0808-CR-471PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BARNES, Judge.

Case Summary

Richard Faris appeals the trial court's denial of his motion to suppress. We affirm.

Issue

The sole issue is whether the trial court properly concluded that Faris's inculpatory statement to police was voluntarily made.

Facts

In January 2007, police interviewed Far-is's four-year-old daughter K.T. She told police that Faris had touched her vagina and had inserted a toy into her vagina. On February 21, 2007, Faris went to the New Albany police station, accompanied by his mother, in response to a police request to speak with him. He was interviewed by two officers in…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Colorado v. ConnellySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Pate v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Webb's Fabulous Pharmacies, Inc. v. BeckwithSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Withrow v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  5. Smith v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1997

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Gibbs v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2011
  2. Wells v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2010
  3. Ryan E. Bean v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2012
  4. Laster v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2009
  5. D.Y. v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2015

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API