Withrow v. Williams
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Souter
In Stone v. Powell, 428 U. S. 465 (1976), we held that when a State has given a full and fair chance to litigate a Fourth Amendment claim, federal habeas review is not available to a state prisoner alleging that his conviction rests on evidence *683obtained through an unconstitutional search or seizure. Today we hold that Stone’s restriction on the exercise of federal habeas jurisdiction does not extend to a state prisoner’s claim that his conviction rests on statements obtained in violation of the safeguards mandated by Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U. S. 436 (1966).
I
Police officers in Romulus,…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Wainwright v. SykesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by573 opinions
- Munaf v. GerenSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Dickerson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Thompson v. KeohaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Banks v. DretkeSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Chavez v. MartinezSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
568 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.