Legal Opinion

Withrow v. Williams

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided June 28, 1993No. 91-1030PublishedCited by 573 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Souter

In Stone v. Powell, 428 U. S. 465 (1976), we held that when a State has given a full and fair chance to litigate a Fourth Amendment claim, federal habeas review is not available to a state prisoner alleging that his conviction rests on evidence *683obtained through an unconstitutional search or seizure. Today we hold that Stone’s restriction on the exercise of federal habeas jurisdiction does not extend to a state prisoner’s claim that his conviction rests on statements obtained in violation of the safeguards mandated by Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U. S. 436 (1966).

I

Police officers in Romulus,…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  5. Wainwright v. SykesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by573 opinions

  1. Munaf v. GerenSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
  2. Dickerson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Thompson v. KeohaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  4. Banks v. DretkeSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  5. Chavez v. MartinezSupreme Court of the United States · 2003

568 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API