Legal Opinion

Standard Salt & Cement Co. v. Commercial Casualty Insurance

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided April 1, 1927No. 25,820PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Lees, C.

This is an appeal from a judgment in favor of the plaintiff for $1,000 less than the amount it sought to recover.

The complaint alleges that Evenson & TJtterberg were contractors engaged in erecting a unit of the city hall at Virginia; that the respondent insurance company was surety on their bond, conditioned as required by Gr. S. 1923, § 9700, relating to bonds of public contractors; that appellant furnished materials to the contractors for use in the construction of the building; that the materials were of the value of $5,743.53, and that only $3,296.49 had been paid.

The answer…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Standard Oil Co. v. DaySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
  2. Kipp v. ClingerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
  3. Nash v. KirschoffSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
  4. Breen v. CameronSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
  5. Radichel v. Federal Surety Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1927

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Stevens v. Minneapolis Fire Department Relief Ass'nSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1945
  2. Marthaler MacHine & Engineering Co. v. MeyersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1928
  3. Berg v. PenttilaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API